On Equilibria of N-seller and N-buyer Bargaining Games

نویسنده

  • Jiawei Li
چکیده

A group of players which contain n sellers and n buyers bargain over the partitions of n pies. A seller (/buyer) has to reach an agreement with a buyer (/seller) on the division of a pie. The players bargain in a system like the stock market: each seller(buyer) can either offer a selling(buying) price to all buyers(sellers) or accept a price offered by another buyer(seller). The offered prices are known to all. Once a player accepts a price offered by another one, the division of a pie between them is determined. Each player has a constant discounting factor and the discounting factors of all players are common knowledge. In this article, we prove that the equilibrium of this bargaining problem is a unanimous division rate for all players, which is equivalent to Nash bargaining equilibrium of a two-player bargaining game in which the discounting factors of two players are the average of n buyers and the average of n sellers respectively. This result shows the relevance between bargaining equilibrium and general equilibrium of markets.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Stationary equilibria in bargaining with externalities

This paper studies infinite-horizon bargaining between a seller and multiple buyers when externalities are present. We extend the analysis in Jehiel & Moldovanu (1995a) by allowing for both pure and mixed equilibria. A characterization of the stationary subgame perfect equilibria in generic games is presented. Equilibria with delay exist only for strong positive externalities. Since each buyer ...

متن کامل

Transparency, complementarity and holdout

This article characterizes the conditions under which holdout (i.e. bargaining inefficiency) may, or may not be significant in a two-sided, one-buyer-many-seller model with complementarity. Our central result is that the severity of holdout (i.e. inefficiency) is critically dependent on three factors, (a) the transparency of the bargaining protocol, (b) the outside option of the buyer, and (c) ...

متن کامل

The Myerson - Satterthwaite Theorem

The Myerson-Satterthwaite Theorem (MS) is an impossibility result for bilateral bargaining. The original cite is Myerson and Satterthwaite (1983). The proof here most closely follows Krishna (2009) and Milgrom (2004). One person, the seller, owns one unit of an indivisible object. The seller values the object at c, which I refer to as the seller’s type. The other person, the buyer, values the o...

متن کامل

Bargaining with Externalities∗

This paper studies bargaining between a seller and multiple buyers with externalities. A full characterization of the stationary subgame perfect equilibria in generic games is presented. Equilibria exist for generic parameter values, with delay only for strong positive externalities. The outcome is efficient if externalities are not too positive. Increasing the bargaining power of the seller de...

متن کامل

Markov Bargaining Games

I consider an alternating offer bargaining game which is played by a risk neutral buyer and seller, where the value of the good to be traded follows a Markov process. For these games the existence of a perfect equilibrium is proved and the set of equilibrium payoffs and strategies are characterised. The main results are: (a) If the buyer is less patient than the seller, then there will be delay...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1510.04015  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015